A review of: D GEIER, J KERN, C GARVER, J ADAMS, T AUDHYA, R NATAF, M GEIER (2008). Biomarkers of environmental toxicity and susceptibility in autism☆ Journal of the Neurological Sciences DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.08.021

One bio-social model of the etiology of autism suggests that a genetic predisposition, in the form of limited ability to remove toxins from the body (e.g., mercury), combined with exposure to such toxins, leads to an increased risk for developing autism. As I previously described in this study, researchers have examined urinary porphyrins as a measure of mercury exposure, and some studies have found increased levels of porphyrins in children with autism. In this study, the authors examined urinary porphyrin metabolites (a proposed measure of heavy metal toxicity) and plasma sulfates (a proposed measure of detoxification capacity) among children with autism.

The sample included 28 children between the ages of 2 and 16 recruited from the Dallas/Fort Worth community. These children had a diagnosis of autism (Childhood Autism Rating Scale scores above 30). This group was categorized into a mild (CARS
38.5) autism. Blood and urine samples were collected for analysis. A laboratory standard control sample of typically developing children was also included in the plasma analysis only.

The mild ASD group had significantly lower ratios of key porphyrin levels when compared with kids with severe ASD. The following group means are statistically significantly different from each other:

MILD ASD = 4.92±2.79 VS. SEVERE ASD = 6.0±1.58

MILD ASD = 17.3±8.9 VS. SEVERE ASD = 24.05±7.28

Pentacarboxyporphyrin/uroporphyrins I and III
MILD ASD = 0.19±0.06 VS. SEVERE ASD = 0.27±0.08

Precoprophyrin/uroporphyrins I and III
MILD ASD = 0.68±0.28 VS. SEVERE ASD = 1.09±0.36

Coproporphyrins I and III/ uroporphyrins I & and III
MILD ASD = 9.54±2.97 VS. SEVERE ASD = 12.64±3.47

(Precoproporphyrin+ pentacarboxyporphyrin) / (uroporphyrins I & and III+ heptacarboxyporphryin)
MILD ASD = 0.73±0.26 VS. SEVERE ASD = 1.1±0.29

The authors concluded that increased urinary porphyrin metabolites were associated with more severe autism based on CARS scores. Urinary porphyrin are believed to represent mercury toxicity.

Furthermore, the authors found significantly lower levels of plasma sulfates (Plasma cysteine, Plasma reduced glutathione, Plasma oxidized glutathione) among children with autism when compared to typically developing kids. Decreased sulfation (low plasma levels of sulfates) can indicate limited detoxification capacity, especially of heavy metals such as mercury.

In conclusion, the study presents some compelling evidence regarding differences in urinary porphyrin metabolites between kids with mild and severe autism symptoms, as well as differences in plasma sulfates between kids with autism when compared to neurotypical kids. This is consistent with the author’s theory that mercury exposure plays a role in autism. However, given the controversy regarding the mercury-autism association, I would like to clarify that these results do not indicate that mercury causes autism. Yes, it is possible that mercury toxicity and reduced detoxification capacity plays a role in autism, both, in the onset and severity. However, it is also possible that Autism itself results in reduced detoxification capacity and mercury toxicity via other mechanisms, but that such toxicity is not associated at all with the development of the disorder. For example, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are tests used in arthritis. Atypical results on these tests are found in people with arthritis. Yet, neither one is related to any of the proposed causes of arthritis, and instead reflect a consequence of the disorder itself (inflammation).

Post to Twitter

Tagged with:

5 Responses to Heavy metal toxicity and detoxification capacity in autism

  1. Dr. Polly says:

    Interesting link for sure but I’d certainly like to see a larger sample. I’m wondering if there are other substances hypothesized to differ in autistic versus neural normal children? Also, you mention arthritis, any other conditions that show heavy metal differences? I noticed the name Geier in the author list – a name I seem to recall as associated with a not unbiased autism group (fingering thimerosal). Is this the same “researcher” whose work was featured in the Evidence of Harm book? Just curious. I could be wrong.

    Much thanks for your objectivity.

  2. Hi Dr. Polly,

    yes, you are correct. This is the same Geier group that is highly controversial in the autism community. I’m not familiar with any conditions leading to reduced detoxification capacity (thus resulting in heavy metal differences). Thanks for reading.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Hi TranslatingAutism –

    I’d like to say I appreciate very much your style of analysis. Nicely done.

    - pD

  4. jbarrett64 says:

    This article might be interesting, regarding toxins and Autism:


  5. shgreen says:

    I was just wondering if something like Gerson Therapy (detoxification) has been used successfully (or at least with positive results) in treatment of autism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


five + 7 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.