The New York Times recently published an article about Junior Kumon, a Japanese developed tutoring program brought to the U.S.  The author sets the scene with a three year-old that is practicing writing double-digit numbers for which she gets a sticker when completed correctly.  Most students attend the program a couple of times a week for up to an hour each time and they have nightly homework to be completed with their parents.  It is easy for me to respect the program’s goal: cultivate globally competitive students who can then become globally competitive professionals.  Here is where I started having difficulty: the Junior Kumon program enrolls students from two to five years of age and primarily utilizes a drill and kill methodology designed to provide early reading and math enrichment.  The primary problem that I saw was that the author could find no evidence that this method actually leads to these little people growing into big people with greater chances for professional success.  In fact, the research overall seems to be lacking.  For example, the US Department of Education explored several studies of Kumon Math and could not draw any conclusions on the effectiveness of the program due to both a limited number of studies and research flaws.  The Kumon approach also makes me wonder about the potential impact that these methods may have on the development of other important skills, such as creativity and reasoning.

The author reported information from the fields of psychology and child development.  The consensus?  True, Junior Kumon can help children learn math facts and literacy skills.  The rest of the feedback from the experts suggests that the Kumon approach misses the beauty of early childhood learning.  Okay, so those are my words, but there really wasn’t support for the program’s approach while there was a lot of support for good old experiential learning.  You know, the kind that happens when junior is stacking blocks, making a castle in the sand, sorting objects by color, or working with a friend on building a fort out of the sofa cushions.  The creativity, critical thinking, and interpersonal skills that go into these types of early experiences pave the way for future academic and social development, which lies at the heart of why play has been so valued for so long.  A 2008 article by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) reviewed research on play and found that social interaction during play enhanced vocabulary and social skills, exposure to print in play fostered early literacy, and the use of materials such as blocks helped with spatial relationships and logical thinking.

Programs like Junior Kumon remind me of the predicament that public schools have faced since the onslaught of standardized tests designed to leave no child behind.  Teaching to the test at the expense of rich learning experiences, reduced participation in the arts and other subjects deemed to be not academic enough, and less time spent outside going bonkers in the fresh air are some of the side effects of this shift in public education.  Good intentions?  Yes!  The best we can do for our children to help them flourish into smart, critical thinkers capable of working on teams to generate ideas that propel our world to a better place?  Not so sure…but probably not.

Source: Zernike, K (2011, May 13).  Fast-tracking to Kindergarten? The New York Times. Retrieved May 15, 2011 from

Be Sociable, Share!

Post to Twitter

4 Responses to Special Editorial: Does Early Enrichment Still Let a Kid Be a Kid?

  1. Daniel says:

    I write from Majorca, Spain, so first of all I want to apologize for my English. I have discovered recently this blog and I trully enjoy your articles and information. Also I would like to ask you one question about the topic of Kumon, although I basically agree with the article. The best way to learn is in a context and playing – for instance math/building blocks -, but I find hard to understand the reason why a daily 20 minutes drill exercice – like the math Junior Kumon – is so harmful. If a children already has a lot of free time to play in an unstructured way with their parents, relatives and friends why is so negative to take a program like kumon or simmilar? Can’t it go together? Thanks!

    • Anita M. Schimizzi, Ph.D. says:

      Thank you for your comment. In response to your question about daily Kumon, a combination of Kumon plus play probably would not be harmful. The key is to make sure that children do indeed have a sufficient amount of time for unstructured play, including within a social context, as this promotes all sorts of important developmental growth. The important piece to note is that there is lots and lots of research on the benefits of play but very little research on Kumon and that research that does exist (on the math program, at least) has been noted as deficient by the US Department of Education. The article provided anecdotal information that parents involved in Kumon provided, but my understanding is that there is not solid data to support Kumon. Perhaps the article will inspire some studies.

  2. Christina says:

    I do believe learning structures like this can have major affects on social skills. From my own personal experience, most of my “super intellectual” friends, who attended school programs like this, did loose their creativity. Most of them are social awkward, for a like of better words, as they didn’t grow up with peer settings, or with the idea that all their peers were their competition. It’s hard to become friends with the enemy.

    Personally, I’m an extreme extrovert, who was raises on arts programs. My parents, well wanting me to do my best in school, never felt I needed to be an over achiever. They wanted me to get good grades, but be a kid at the same time.

    It is my less socially awkward intellectual friends our now either doing great in the business world or are running their own business in some form.

    • Eli says:

      I agree that Kumon has its pros, but it also has its cons. Knowing that Kumon has a history of methods that help many children succeed in most school subjects, but it may not be for each and every child out there in this world. My son has been with Kumon for two years and he kept complaining that it was boring and did not like how he was taught. He often comes home complaining that it was too hard and did not enjoy the work that Kumon Centers assigned. Therefore, we found an alternative and has switched over to Beestar since last year. We saw significant changes and progress as we checked his progress online. Not only did we see changes literally, but we also see that our son has changed mentally and physically. He now comes home and also tries to engage us with the work that Beestar assigns. He is in love with what Beestar offers. We are very happy that we have found Beestar and will love to enroll our second child with them soon!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


four + = 13

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.